onlinepersone#2 (7:51:24 PM): hey
onlineperson#1 (7:51:50 PM): hello
onlineperson#2 (7:52:00 PM): whats up
onlineperson#1 (7:52:09 PM): the ceiling
onlineperson#2 (7:52:21 PM): d00d no way
onlineperson#2 (7:52:37 PM): figuratively whats up
onlineperson#2 (7:52:44 PM): what is happening in your life?
onlineperson#1 (7:52:46 PM): nothing
onlineperson#2 (7:52:57 PM): thats boring
onlineperson#1 (7:53:02 PM): yup
onlineperson#2 (7:53:19 PM): well
onlineperson#2 (7:53:27 PM): talking to you is usually a joy
onlineperson#2 (7:53:31 PM): now im depressed
onlineperson#2(7:53:34 PM): thanks a bundle!
onlineperson#1 (7:53:35 PM): im sorry
onlineperson#2 (7:53:46 PM): lol
onlineperson#2 (7:53:46 PM): im jking
onlineperson#2 (7:53:49 PM): jking?
onlineperson#2 (7:53:55 PM): yeah*
onlineperson#1 (7:53:56 PM): okay
onlineperson#1 (7:53:59 PM):
onlineperson#2 (7:54:16 PM): see
onlineperson#2 (7:54:16 PM): now thats better
onlineperson#1 (7:54:24 PM): :?
onlineperson#2 (7:54:35 PM): brb im a go get sum lemonade
onlineperson#1 (7:54:39 PM): k
onlineperson#2 (7:56:00 PM): woot
onlineperson#2 (7:56:06 PM): i love lemonade
onlineperson#1 (7:56:09 PM): me too
onlineperson#2 (7:56:21 PM): its like
onlineperson#2 (7:56:30 PM): delicious golden happiness
onlineperson#1 (7:57:56 PM): happiness shouldn't be defined as lemonade, to do that would be morally wrong and degrading of other people's respected attributes towards the feeling itself and not the definition worthy of individual interpretation
onlineperson#2 (7:58:12 PM): okay
onlineperson#2 (7:58:13 PM): wha...?
onlineperson#2 (7:58:24 PM): im referencing my personal views of happiness
onlineperson#2 (7:58:48 PM): one of which is perfectly described as that which we know as "lemonade"
onlineperson#1 (7:59:05 PM): and im expressing my personal views of the repressing of individual thought and representation
onlineperson#2 (7:59:07 PM): im not trying to impose abstract beliefs of lemonade on you or anyone else
onlineperson#2 (7:59:16 PM): i don't understand
onlineperson#2 (7:59:26 PM): how can you express if you repress?
onlineperson#2 (7:59:41 PM): expression by repression? complete opposites
onlineperson#1 (7:59:46 PM): my point exactly
onlineperson#2 (8:00:08 PM): very nice.
onlineperson#2 (8:00:15 PM): what was the point of all that just now?
onlineperson#2 (8:00:31 PM): like that whole headache inducing spiel?
onlineperson#1 (8:00:36 PM): i think ive gone crazy
onlineperson#2 (8:00:41 PM): well
onlineperson#2 (8:00:47 PM): i went crazy a long time ago
onlineperson#2 (8:00:53 PM): but its a good crazy
onlineperson#2 (8:01:05 PM): i can separate my conscious thought and my unconscious thought
onlineperson#2 (8:01:32 PM): and harness the unused portions of my brain, to the point where i can read peoples thoughts and use limited telekinesis
onlineperson#2 (8:01:37 PM): i moved a plastic fork once lol
onlineperson#1 (8:02:12 PM): is there such thing as good crazy? or is it all just a way to define the limitations of acceptable behavior when in fact contributing nothing to society except a sense of separation and isolation?
onlineperson#2 (8:02:38 PM): oh but i do contribute
onlineperson#2 (8:03:06 PM): ive published my techniques
onlineperson#2 (8:03:08 PM): if every capable individual in the world used my technique
onlineperson#2 (8:03:34 PM): humans could advance to a new intellectual level, with near-instantaneous thought transfer and analyzation
onlineperson#2 (8:03:47 PM): it would solve a lot of problems
onlineperson#2 (8:04:04 PM): and if more than one person fused their frames of reference, large scale telekinesis could be possible
onlineperson#1 (8:04:06 PM): in who's opinion would you make this contribution, assuming t IS in fact productive to society if their is no such judge fit to define the outskirts of every matter known and unknown to man kind, i quote imagine the impossibilities
onlineperson#2(8:04:28 PM): in my own opinion
onlineperson#2 (8:04:35 PM): the only one that matters to me
onlineperson#2 (8:05:01 PM): im my own reality, which i live in partially fused with the collective "real world"
onlineperson#2 (8:05:22 PM): the contribution is the only thing that makes basic existence comprehensible
onlineperson#1 (8:06:58 PM): and in who's opinion and outlook have you taken by this matter all of mankind has some how developed there own separate path of thinking to morph it into the strains of telekinesis would not only go against the very molecular structure of our being, it would rip the foundations of what is the first and only fully functioning piece of inter cellular basis from beneath us
onlineperson#2 (8:07:19 PM): which is?
onlineperson#2 (8:07:32 PM): because telekinesis hasn't torn me apart yet
onlineperson#2 (8:08:04 PM): given that, I've only managed to move a fork and some crumbs, but i CAN accelerate them at high enough velocities to cause pain
onlineperson#2 (8:08:40 PM): and im still molecularly complete, i haven't seen any kind of atomic destabilization anywhere in my body or of any one of my consciousnesses
onlineperson#1 (8:09:24 PM): not to yourself would any susceptible damage be done ,only an ominous and continual source of repression on it own. if it were not already began the fibers of humanity's own closeness and openness could be the cause of our destruction
onlineperson#2 (8:09:44 PM): hahaha
onlineperson#2 (8:09:49 PM): humanity isn't open
onlineperson#2 (8:09:57 PM): that the final dream, you know?
onlineperson#2 (8:10:11 PM): if humanity were open, we'd all unintentionally kill ourselves
onlineperson#2 (8:10:17 PM): but we'd all die happy
onlineperson#1 (8:10:25 PM): h/o
onlineperson#2 (8:10:27 PM): knowing that we achieved our fullest potential
onlineperson#2 (8:10:29 PM): lol
onlineperson#2 (8:10:32 PM): potential
onlineperson#2 (8:10:55 PM): but you're right about repression
onlineperson#2 (8:11:08 PM): in unconsciously affects nearly every person who ever lived
onlineperson#2 (8:11:38 PM): i try to get rid of repression and allow every single aspect of my being to be free onlineperson#2 (8:12:02 PM): it's very very difficult but just being aware enough to try is more than most can say
onlineperson#1 (8:17:06 PM): im back. and i was referring to your reference to telekinesis, becoming one in mind and thought, is only a beginning of a much more sophisticated form of dictator ship and the ability to actually control the thoughts and actions of another individual would not only cause a new form of capital revolutionism accessible to common thieves it would also create higher chaos in the justice system which would them have to be completely revised to adequately determine the correct form of punishment and detainment
onlineperson#2 (8:17:28 PM): well
onlineperson#2 (8:17:33 PM): thats true
onlineperson#2 (8:17:43 PM): i have a severe lack of morals
onlineperson#2 (8:18:03 PM): and if i was ever able to completely understand the inner workings of the brain 
onlineperson#2 (8:18:27 PM): i would probably use directed telekinesis to kill/take over the minds of others
onlineperson#2 (8:18:47 PM): effectively ruling all beings of lesser raw brainpower than I
onlineperson#1 (8:20:46 PM): that's understandable seeing as you refuse the tradition religion hence refusing most common accountability aspects. really there is nothing more expected of you than a human being with raw intellect and no conscience of a separation set since creation of man of clear right and wrong, and an honest understanding of empathy which in turn would weaken a brain of higher power and lead to the downfall of your own dictatorship. so really you have very little to worry about
onlineperson#2 (8:21:27 PM): BAHAHAHA
onlineperson#2 (8:21:31 PM): lack of morals saves my own mind
onlineperson#2 (8:21:39 PM): i knew it
onlineperson#1 (8:22:12 PM): you're misinterpreting my analogy
onlineperson#2 (8:22:17 PM): thats the only reason most people cant even begin to fathom my thought processes- then could never bring themselves to do what it requires, because it goes against what they were conditioned to believe is "right"
onlineperson#1 (8:22:20 PM): analogy
onlineperson#2 (8:22:41 PM): in the absence of right and wrong
onlineperson#2 (8:22:45 PM): anything is possible
onlineperson#2 (8:22:59 PM): because theres no reason to question anything and therefore destroy potentials onlineperson#2 (8:23:16 PM): without the destruction of potentials
onlineperson#2 (8:23:42 PM): every possible thing occurs and recombines until the singularity is achieved
onlineperson#1 (8:24:05 PM): without the basic understanding of right and wrong the human thought process could not only begin to over reach it's own abilities the world would be under a complete and utter lack of knowledge and pride and discipline, the kind of principles that in the beginning formed the states of the country in which you currently reside
onlineperson#2 (8:24:07 PM): the singularity, being the term i use to scribe my process
onlineperson#2 (8:24:22 PM): screw the united states
onlineperson#2 (8:24:37 PM): granted
onlineperson#1 (8:24:53 PM): and morals go down the john :P
onlineperson#2 (8:24:57 PM): the only reason im able to say that is because of the parameters our nation defines as acceptable
onlinepersone#2 (8:25:07 PM): well
onlineperson#2 (8:25:18 PM): thats the thing
onlineperson#2 (8:26:34 PM): the only way to achieve total singularity is to have a large number of achieved persons combine their abilities and either destroy or absorb every single other individual...actions that would quickly be put down by any government or dominant religion
onlineperson#1(8:28:30 PM): without the lesser individuals, the greater would cease to become defined as great due to the obliteration of the intellectually challenged class directly beneath it who now ceased to exists due to the stupidity of the higher class.
onlineperson#2 (8:28:43 PM): doesn't matter
onlineperson#2 (8:29:01 PM): as long as the overall intention is to achieve singularity
onlineperson#2 (8:29:05 PM): theres no greater or lesser
onlineperson#2 (8:29:16 PM): its all the same
onlineperson#1 (8:30:27 PM): which brings me back to my previous point singularity is simply another of the various ways to compress and conform a group of INDIVIDUALS into a single unit, which is then incapable of emitting more than one brilliant idea at a time, and with singularity, there would be know opposition
onlineperson#2 (8:30:43 PM): aha
onlineperson#2 (8:30:55 PM): but the true singularity is also the individuality
onlineperson#2 (8:30:59 PM): its not a group
onlineperson#2 (8:31:04 PM): its one being
onlineperson#1 (8:31:18 PM): without opposing ideas and data, humanity would still think of the earth as flat, and gravity  would be a long ago tossed theory
onlineperson#2 (8:31:28 PM): composed (at first) of fused individuals but later comes to a single being
onlineperson#2 (8:31:54 PM): one being
onlineperson#2 (8:32:00 PM): and that, is the end of the world
onlineperson#2 (8:32:12 PM): because with only one being in the universe
onlineperson#2 (8:32:25 PM): it would destroy itself
onlineperson#2 (8:32:27 PM): or maybe
onlineperson#2 (8:32:59 PM): divide itself, and revert back to being "normal" humans 
onlineperson#2 (8:33:02 PM): whatever
onlineperson#1(8:33:04 PM): and then where are the opposing ideas, as i previously stated: even the greatest most highly intellectual will soon collapse under it's own ignorance soley because there is a lack of opinion and diversity
onlineperson#2 (8:33:14 PM): yup
onlineperson#1 (8:33:18 PM): h/o
onlineperson#2 (8:33:18 PM): the end of the world
onlineperson#2 (8:33:42 PM): but until the potential is achieved, everything will always fall back to they start
onlineperson#2 (8:33:59 PM): the only way to end everything is to achieve singularity and allow it to die
onlineperson#1 (8:37:14 PM): nick if that were the case humanity would be deemed hopeless, and that is the one thing all mankind is not. every single individual has the potential to achieve great things, it's what we do with that potential that really defines who we are as individuals and not one being, we have different levels of accomplishments and diverse areas of weakness so that in our own weakness a greater power can be made strong, and through him is the only way to consider mankind anything other than dust.
onlineperson#2 (8:37:49 PM): exactly
onlineperson#2 (8:37:52 PM): and thats why
onlineperson#2 (8:37:57 PM): i have this insane idea
onlineperson#2 (8:38:02 PM): because everyone is different
onlineperson#1 (8:38:05 PM): what do u mean exactly?!
onlineperson#2 (8:38:09 PM): and thats why
onlineperson#2 (8:38:14 PM): i love in my own reality
onlineperson#2 (8:38:41 PM): where i don't have to deal with anything other than my own crazy, self destroying, convoluted ideas
onlineperson#1 (8:38:45 PM): i just referenced a whole bunch of bible verses and u didn't even call me on it, are u sure you're an atheist?!
onlineperson#2 (8:41:39 PM): yep
onlineperson#2 (8:41:46 PM): thats why i don't believe in anything
onlineperson#2 (8:41:48 PM): i cant
onlineperson#2 (8:42:03 PM): my basis of existence is based on a contradiction
onlineperson#2 (8:42:21 PM): and thats why i have to separate my consciousness
onlineperson#2 (8:42:42 PM): because i have to divide my thoughts constantly to avoid instantaneous elf destruction
onlineperson#1 (8:42:48 PM): i wont even go there. ive gotta go, good bye, you're a great help to my goal of becoming a lawyer
onlineperson#2 (8:42:49 PM): i was suicidal once
onlineperson#2 (8:43:03 PM): you know?
onlineperson#2 (8:43:10 PM): i had to separate my mind on that day
onlineperson#2 (8:43:45 PM): if i were to combine my personalities again, i would possibly be the smartest person on earth, but then I'd kill myself because of the things i know
onlineperson#2 (8:43:51 PM): its horrible
onlineperson#1 (8:43:57 PM): that wouldn't be good.
onlineperson#2 (8:44:00 PM): thats where the separate reality comes into play
onlineperson#1 (8:44:18 PM): i have to go
onlineperson#2 (8:44:23 PM): i can live in a way that i have more than one fully functional individuality
onlineperson#2 (8:44:25 PM): okay
onlineperson#1 (8:44:29 PM): bye
onlineperson#2 (8:44:32 PM): see ya :-)