Drinking Age Should Be Lowered | Teen Ink

Drinking Age Should Be Lowered

May 18, 2008
By Anonymous

People use alcohol for numerous reasons; peer pressure, celebration, anxiety, sadness, boredom, rebellion and insomnia are just a few. Teens fall under the category of “people”. The legal drinking age is currently twenty-one, but illegally drinking age is as low as zero. Why? Is the main question asked. I can assure you the under age drinking age percentage would drop if the age is lowered.

Few reasons for teens drinking are: peer pressure, enjoyment, etc. But the main reason for doing so is “breaking the law.” 87% of high school seniors have used alcohol. That means that a large quantity of teens under the age of seventeen to eighteen have used alcohol before. We all know why teens drink, I mean is common since. Just the feel that they get of breaking the law is huge. Being rebel and not following the rules is an important role of a teen’s life. Consequences are the one that change them, but we don’t want them to experience the consequences of being under the influence of alcohol because we know them and they are fatal. Dying in a car accident and killing others is a mess that we don’t want to clean.

Despite the fact that is illegal for young teens to purchase it, they are able to get it through their parent’s own liquor cabinets, unscrupulous store clerks, or older friends who purchase it for them. As we all see, is not hard for teens to obtain alcohol. Why not lower the drinking age then? I mean any way you put it, they are getting it.

We have all heard of the famous saying “we want you to join the military and protect your country.” Blah blah blah. Well, you are telling me that I can legally kill someone at the age of eighteen, while I sign up with the military and go to war but I can’t have a sip of alcohol. Due to this none senseless situation, age should be equaled. In other words, if voting and military sign up is eighteen, then drinking should also be eighteen. Besides at the age of eighteen you are legally an adult. Why can’t we drink then?

Drinking age in Australia is eighteen, and in UK is as low as sixteen in restaurants. Studies have showed that those teens/adults are perfectly fine. In fact, Dr. Ruth Engs; professor of Applied Health Sciences at Indiana University in Bloomington, uses this examples to propose the following: “……the drinking age be lowered to about 18 or 19 and permit those of legal age to consume in socially controlled environment such as restaurants and official school and university functions” (direct quote from Dr. Engs).

Drinking age should be lowered, and I know that by lowering it we can drop the percentage of reckless teen alcohol abusers. It is worth trying it , and if everything goes the opposite then change the law once more (which is done lots of times, for dumb reasons) and raise the drinking age back to twenty-one. Changes are always good (most of the times), and I know this one in particular is an excellent one.


Similar Articles

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

This article has 740 comments.


katie5 said...
on Dec. 10 2010 at 8:16 am
yes i know that is soooo true i totaly agree wit that a least someone has there head is skrewd on strait

on Dec. 9 2010 at 7:09 pm
Patriots BRONZE, Brutus, Michigan
1 article 0 photos 10 comments

Favorite Quote:
Tackle, Tackle Go Patriots.

amen brother

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:26 pm
Listen up people, Jimmy Dane 34 just proved an excelent point!!!

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:20 pm
jkjk123 has a better point, alchohol does do more damage to the liver...

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:19 pm
Exactly, they wouldn't feel that adrenaline rush like they did when they were "breaking the rules".

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:16 pm

The US should NOT change the drinkning age because:

1) Teens and children's brains are still developing.

2) That would just make teens/children feel entitled to get drunk and 'boozed' up.

3) The US' modern society has not allowed drinking under the age of 21 for decades therefore, children/teens would not understand or be responsible.

*If we were to have drinking under the age of 21, we should have done that when the country was still moderately developing. For example: If we had begun drinking at dinner/or breakfast once a day, then we would not feel compelled to impress anyone by getting drunk. Therefore elimenating or at least lowering the percentages of alchohol related deaths and accidents.


ashleyr said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:09 pm
ashleyr, Darien, Illinois
0 articles 0 photos 6 comments

Favorite Quote:
Time waits for no one.

I personally think that the purpose of the drinking age being 21 is to try to make sure that people are mature enough to handle the responsibility. Ideally, the drinking age would be different based on maturity levels, but that's way too impossible, so 21 I think is a safe age to somewhat prevent people being irresponsible. And at least there are consequences to teach people who drink and drive that it's stupid.

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:06 pm
Ahh... you just changed my opinion a little, your right, I completely forgot about the effects of alcohol on the brain.

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:03 pm
you still have your whole life in front of you at the age of 21... but hey opinions differ

Jacob44 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 5:01 pm
In France, children have alcohol every supper. This makes sense because the children will be used to it and as soon as they hit 21, they won't go get 'boozed' up every night just because they can. It makes sense to lower the drinking age, but gradually. I agree with the article.

TAYlOR64 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 4:39 pm
hahaaaaa. it reallllyyyy is thoughhh.

on Dec. 9 2010 at 2:44 pm
sleepinginthegarden BRONZE, Kingston, Massachusetts
2 articles 0 photos 66 comments
i agree completly well kinda

DerekW BRONZE said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 1:50 pm
DerekW BRONZE, Weedsport, New York
3 articles 0 photos 5 comments

Favorite Quote:
favorite qoute is nobody has ever drowned in sweat by lou holtz

I agree very much with this article, the lower the better

hail storm said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 10:05 am
i agree that they shouldn't lower the drinking age because people who are under the age of 21 are still kids and have there whole life a head of them.

on Dec. 9 2010 at 9:51 am
bookworm77 BRONZE, Emporia, Kansas
3 articles 0 photos 6 comments

Favorite Quote:
"Life is short, break the rules, forgive quickly, kiss slowly, love truly, laugh uncontrollably, and never regret anything that made you smile." Mark Twain

This is a very well thought out article. Though i don't agree with your point of view i do respect your opion. good job!

on Dec. 9 2010 at 9:47 am
Bubbles_McLovin, Pellston, Michigan
0 articles 0 photos 3 comments
I think that you should not lower the drinking age becuase they would not responsable drinkers. even adults are not responsable enough to drink.

katie5 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 8:54 am
skrew the drinking age and let the kids drin.......by the way that picture is really scray on this article

AJ roxs said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 8:48 am
I think that people shouldnt drink until they have their own house. Or until the age of 21

e123 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 8:47 am
I think that the drinking age should stay the same because some people are not responsible enough to be able to drink at a younger age.

70>00 said...
on Dec. 9 2010 at 8:45 am
no no no no