All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Drinking Age Should Be Lowered
People use alcohol for numerous reasons; peer pressure, celebration, anxiety, sadness, boredom, rebellion and insomnia are just a few. Teens fall under the category of “people”. The legal drinking age is currently twenty-one, but illegally drinking age is as low as zero. Why? Is the main question asked. I can assure you the under age drinking age percentage would drop if the age is lowered.
Few reasons for teens drinking are: peer pressure, enjoyment, etc. But the main reason for doing so is “breaking the law.” 87% of high school seniors have used alcohol. That means that a large quantity of teens under the age of seventeen to eighteen have used alcohol before. We all know why teens drink, I mean is common since. Just the feel that they get of breaking the law is huge. Being rebel and not following the rules is an important role of a teen’s life. Consequences are the one that change them, but we don’t want them to experience the consequences of being under the influence of alcohol because we know them and they are fatal. Dying in a car accident and killing others is a mess that we don’t want to clean.
Despite the fact that is illegal for young teens to purchase it, they are able to get it through their parent’s own liquor cabinets, unscrupulous store clerks, or older friends who purchase it for them. As we all see, is not hard for teens to obtain alcohol. Why not lower the drinking age then? I mean any way you put it, they are getting it.
We have all heard of the famous saying “we want you to join the military and protect your country.” Blah blah blah. Well, you are telling me that I can legally kill someone at the age of eighteen, while I sign up with the military and go to war but I can’t have a sip of alcohol. Due to this none senseless situation, age should be equaled. In other words, if voting and military sign up is eighteen, then drinking should also be eighteen. Besides at the age of eighteen you are legally an adult. Why can’t we drink then?
Drinking age in Australia is eighteen, and in UK is as low as sixteen in restaurants. Studies have showed that those teens/adults are perfectly fine. In fact, Dr. Ruth Engs; professor of Applied Health Sciences at Indiana University in Bloomington, uses this examples to propose the following: “……the drinking age be lowered to about 18 or 19 and permit those of legal age to consume in socially controlled environment such as restaurants and official school and university functions” (direct quote from Dr. Engs).
Drinking age should be lowered, and I know that by lowering it we can drop the percentage of reckless teen alcohol abusers. It is worth trying it , and if everything goes the opposite then change the law once more (which is done lots of times, for dumb reasons) and raise the drinking age back to twenty-one. Changes are always good (most of the times), and I know this one in particular is an excellent one.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 740 comments.
YOU ARE TOTALLY CORRECT!! I WAS WATCHING THE NEWS ONE DAY AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY SAID!!!
no i dont think at all that it should be lowered. WE HAVE OUR ENTIRE LIFE TO DRINK! what is the rush??
im 14 and i dont drink and i wont until i am 21. :)
yes it might be different in other countries but there stupid they dont know the permanent damage to the brain!
Oh don't worry, you don't have to feel sorry for me. My role models include: Obama, Rafael Nadal, Andy Murray, Matt Damon (hes a smart guy), oh yeah and James Bond. Whatd you expect me to say? None? Kim Jong Il, Hitler, Osama Bin Laden, Sadam Hussein, George Bush, and Satan?
How is the way I approach things idiotic or immature? Ive been here, patiently (albeit annoyed) explaining my position and backing it up and all that jazz, while youve been insulting my moral fiber, calling me an idiot, and then have the audacity to include me in your prayers. Just because my opinions dont jive with yours.
When people use another situation to explain or ratify (sp?) a focus, it is uncreative and doesn't truely mean anything. Driving IS different, a 12 yearold may not be old enough to make certain decisions when operative a motovehical due to the lack of experience and lack of observince others.
The big picture, people need to realize that the reason the cat runs from the dog is because it is being chased by it. Same goes for rules, if consuming alcohol was legal for a 17 yearold in the U.S., they would be less inclined to drink it because they aren't rushed and they don't jump on every chance they have to do so.
Maybe it should be lowered....you make a good point about the killing thing too.
Statistics have shown the teens that have a a few sips (or a glass or too) don't feel the need or want to drink. I feel it's because they had a chance where they were aloud to drink, there wasn't any rush of breaking the law to start with.
I guess I'd say lower it to 18 but then you have the college and maturity issue. My brother was 23 when he was nearly killed because he was immature and decided to drink and dirve...then he went and did it again...but anyway and partying in college dorms. It's hard to filter out the immature with the mature.
But I'm still debating what I feel in this issue
First of all, as its stated above, whether the age stays the same or is raised as you want it, people are still going to drink. If the drinking age is lowered, kids wont feel the thrill of breaking the law, and really will actually wear out there desire to drink before it actually can be of any serious consequence. Such as when they have work and bills to pay and get fired from missing too much due to hang overs and the other reasons or whatever.
Lowering the drinking age is a better idea than raising it. Because whatever the law says, teens are still going to drink, and theres not much to be done about it.